Make Crap: Why Productive Failure Beats Perfectionist Success

 

Quick note: Just back from keynoting in Alaska at NHRMA 2025. 

No video this week, as I’m head-down working on my second book, Innovation at Work. I’ve cleared my work calendar to devote every spare minute to book production, which meant making some hard choices! 

Watch for videos to return in a few weeks. In the meantime, enjoy this week’s article! 


Hey there, innovation champions! 

Let me tell you about my own perfectionism disaster.

After my dance career ended, after many twists and turns, I built a career as a “serious artist.” At one point I bought this beautiful blank sketchbook from Italy—gorgeous leather binding, perfect paper—and I was so afraid of ruining it that I didn’t draw in it for years. Years! This professional artist and creativity coach, paralyzed by a blank book.

Finally, in 2023, I got fed up with myself and followed my very own rule from my own book, The Creative Sandbox Way™: “There is no wrong.” I started filling that precious book with terrible doodles, rough sketches, half-formed ideas. And something magical happened—instead of sitting unused on a shelf, that book became a permission slip for more creation.

This is “Make Crap” in action: transforming perfectionism from innovation killer into learning accelerator.

The Perfectionism Penalty That’s Killing Your Speed

Here’s the uncomfortable truth about perfectionism: it’s not about high standards. It’s about fear management dressed up as quality control.

When your brain perceives the threat of “looking stupid” or “being wrong,” it activates threat-detection systems that literally shut down creative thinking networks. All your cognitive resources shift toward error prevention and risk avoidance—the exact opposite of what breakthrough innovation requires.

This explains why teams can debate theoretical solutions for hours while missing simple fixes that become obvious the moment someone actually tries them. Perfectionism doesn’t create better solutions—it prevents solutions from emerging at all.

The Science of Strategic Imperfection

Stanford research reveals something counterintuitive: teams using rapid, low-fidelity approaches consistently reach better solutions than those focused on polished presentations. Why? Because when you make imperfection the explicit goal, your brain relaxes enough to access the creative networks that perfectionist pressure shuts down.

When teams operate in what neuroscientists call “explore mode”—the mental state we enter during play—they generate significantly more novel solutions and make unexpected connections between previously unrelated concepts.

The breakthrough happens when you stop trying to avoid failure and start designing intelligent failures that teach you something valuable.

When Crap Becomes Competitive Advantage

This principle shows up in every major innovation breakthrough once you start looking for it:

Before Slack became a $27.7 billion success, it was Tiny Speck—a completely failed gaming company. When their game flopped, instead of perfectly planning their next move, the team started tinkering with their internal chat tool. That willingness to experiment with something imperfect led directly to revolutionizing workplace communication.

Google Maps exists because someone got curious during a routine meeting and started playing with a satellite mapping tool instead of focusing on the original agenda. That moment of productive “failure” to stay on task accidentally created one of the world’s most-used platforms.

Netflix’s streaming model emerged from a “failed” attempt to make DVD-by-mail more convenient. Instead of perfecting the original model, they embraced the imperfect idea of streaming low-quality video over unreliable internet connections.

The pattern? Breakthrough innovations emerge from permission to explore imperfect ideas rather than pressure to execute perfect plans.

The Permission Slip Principle in Action

In my work with teams, I’ve discovered that most innovation barriers aren’t technical—they’re psychological. People need explicit permission to share half-formed thoughts, question obvious assumptions, and suggest approaches that might not work.

That’s why one of my favorite team exercises is the “Permission Slip Protocol.” Everyone writes themselves permission for one specific behavior they want to try but feel uncertain about: “Permission to share ideas before they’re fully developed,” “Permission to question project assumptions,” “Permission to suggest completely different approaches.”

Then the team gives each other explicit verbal permission. It sounds simple, but removing psychological barriers often unlocks capabilities that were there all along.

The Intelligent Failure Framework

Not all failures are created equal. There’s a crucial difference between careless mistakes and intelligent failures that generate valuable learning.

Careless mistakes: Repeating known bad practices, ignoring obvious risks, or failing due to lack of preparation.

Intelligent failures: Testing new approaches with uncertain outcomes, exploring unproven but promising directions, or discovering the limits of current approaches through systematic experimentation.

Teams that learn to distinguish between these two types of failure can embrace productive imperfection while maintaining accountability for execution quality.

Your Make Crap Reality Check

Ask yourself:

  • How often do potentially breakthrough ideas die because someone decides they’re “not ready yet”?
  • What percentage of your team’s time is spent perfecting plans versus testing imperfect solutions?
  • When did your team last try something knowing it might not work, just to learn what would happen?

If your team defaults to planning and polishing rather than testing and learning, perfectionism is probably costing you breakthrough opportunities.

The Create the Impossible™ Framework Building

Make Crap is the second principle of my Create the Impossible™ framework because it builds directly on the psychological safety of Play Hard. Once teams feel safe to explore, they need permission to fail productively.

But here’s the key: making crap isn’t about celebrating mediocrity. It’s about creating the conditions where excellence can actually emerge through iteration rather than imagination.

What’s Coming Next Week

Next week, I’ll show you how teams transform failures into intelligence through the third principle: Learn Fast. Because permission to fail is just the beginning—the real competitive advantage comes from systematically extracting learning from every experiment, setback, and unexpected outcome.

The goal isn’t to fail for its own sake. It’s to fail forward faster than your competition can succeed backward.


Ready to help your team transform perfectionism into productive failure? My forthcoming book Innovation at Work: 52 Micro-Experiments for Brave Leaders Who Want to Unstick Teams, Spark Ideas, and Build What’s Next includes the exact methods for embracing intelligent failure that drives breakthrough results. Join the early access list for insights and preview content.

Did you see the two cover designs my designer whipped up?

Thanks to everyone who voted in the poll over on LinkedIn

I love the fresh, unexpected layout of #1, and the color vibrancy of #2. And a colleague created a prompt for ChatGPT from those preferences, and came out with this new draft:

I just sent this to my designer with my notes, so stay tuned for an updated version soon! This is the design process at work, which is a mirror image of (ahem) innovation at work! 🤩

Grab your preview content right here.

 

You Are Not a Prompt. You Are the Creator.

Click to watch (13:42) or scroll down to read more

Hey there, innovation champions!

 

Did you know I’m a singer-songwriter? However, for years, I didn’t write a single new song. Not one.

 

Now, I’ve never been the most prolific—or speedy— of songwriters, but still, this creative drought felt… well, let’s just say it wasn’t great for the ego. But every time I sat down to try, I’d think about all the reasons it wasn’t worth the effort.

 

Then AI came along, and that little voice in my head got louder: “Why should I even bother? AI could probably write a better song than I could.”

 

Sound familiar?

 

Here’s the thing: When I first saw AI generate thirty creative uses for a paperclip in the time it took me to think of three, I had what I can only describe as an existential crisis. When I fed AI a rough story draft and it spit back a polished article that sounded surprisingly like my voice, I thought: Am I obsolete?

 

But recently, something shifted. I had a performance deadline looming—always a great motivator—and I decided to try something different. Instead of competing with AI, what if I invited it to be my songwriting partner?

 

What happened next changed everything I thought I knew about creativity in the AI era. We’re asking the wrong question entirely.

 

The Question That’s Paralyzing Us

“Is AI more creative than humans?” seems like a reasonable question. After all, AI can generate art, compose music, write stories, and yes—come up with dozens of uses for a paperclip faster than any human.

 

But this question is actually dangerous because it’s based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what creativity really is.

 

It’s like asking, “Is a telescope better at seeing than the astronomer?” The telescope doesn’t replace the astronomer’s vision—it amplifies it. The astronomer still decides where to look, what’s worth studying, and what the discoveries mean.

 

What Creativity Actually Is

Creativity isn’t just idea generation. It’s not about who can produce the most options fastest.

 

Real creativity involves:

  • Intentionality—Knowing what problem you’re actually trying to solve
  • Context—Understanding the nuanced needs of real humans
  • Synthesis—Connecting disparate ideas in meaningful ways
  • Judgment—Knowing which ideas are worth pursuing
  • Iteration—Refining ideas based on real-world feedback


This is where my Create the Impossible™ framework becomes essential:

 

Play Hard: Creativity Requires Human Curiosity

When I finally sat down with ChatGPT to explore songwriting, something magical happened. I started asking questions AI never would have thought to ask:

“What if this could capture the absurdity of this socio-political moment in a way that makes people both laugh and think?”

“How might this connect to what people are actually experiencing right now?”

 

AI can generate lyrical themes, but it takes human curiosity to ask the questions that lead to authentic creative breakthroughs. Your ability to wonder, to notice what’s missing, to connect dots across your lived experience—that’s irreplaceable.

 

Make Crap: Humans Excel at Productive Imperfection

Here’s what I discovered during my songwriting session: ChatGPT would suggest a theme, and I’d “yes, and” that idea. Then it would “yes, and” me right back. Most of its suggestions were complete flops—but some were worth pursuing.

 

More importantly, AI’s ideas sparked ideas in MY head. That back-and-forth creative tennis match was exhilarating in a way I hadn’t experienced in years.

 

But innovation doesn’t come from perfection. It comes from the willingness to create terrible first attempts, learn from them, and iterate.

 

My first lyrics were messy, incomplete, and full of half-formed ideas. But they were also full of insights that only I could have generated—insights born from my specific experience, my unique perspective, my understanding of what I wanted to express.

 

AI helped refine those insights, but it couldn’t generate them.

 

Learn Fast: The Human Advantage in Sense-Making

AI processes information quickly. But humans excel at something even more valuable: sensing which directions feel most promising.

 

During my songwriting session, ChatGPT generated dozens of potential lyrical directions. But I was the one who recognized which ones resonated with my artistic vision, which ones aligned with my values, and which ones felt authentic to my voice.

 

AI gave me options. I provided the wisdom to choose. And when I performed that song a couple weeks later—my first new material in years—the audience connected with it in a way that felt deeply satisfying.

 

Because ultimately, the song came from me. AI was simply the creative partner I’d always wanted.

 

The Real Danger (And It’s Not What You Think)

The real danger isn’t that AI will replace human creativity. The real danger is that we’ll convince ourselves it already has.

 

When we treat ourselves as mere prompts—as input devices for AI systems—we diminish our own creative power. We become passive consumers of AI-generated content instead of active creators using AI as a tool.

 

But when we remember that we are the creators—the ones with intention, context, and judgment—everything changes.

 

Your New Operating System

Instead of asking “Is AI more creative than me?” try asking:

  • “How can AI help me explore ideas I wouldn’t have considered?”
  • “What questions am I uniquely positioned to ask?”
  • “How can I use AI to amplify my creative process without losing my voice?”


After years of creative drought, I’m writing again. Not because AI replaced my creativity, but because it helped me rediscover it. The songs I’m creating now feel more authentically mine than anything I’ve written in years.

 

Because I finally understood: I’m not competing with AI. I’m collaborating with it.

 

Your Challenge This Week

Pick one creative project you’ve been avoiding because “AI could probably do it better.”

 

Now approach it with this new mindset: You are not a prompt. You are the creator. AI is your amplifier, not your replacement.

 

Start with your unique perspective, your specific context, your particular curiosity. Then invite AI to be your creative partner—not to do the work for you, but to help you do it better.

 

You’ll discover something remarkable: When you embrace your role as the creator, AI doesn’t diminish your creativity—it reveals just how uniquely powerful your human imagination really is.

 

Ready to reclaim your creative power? Let’s explore how you can lead with confidence in the AI era. Book your complimentary Innovation Strategy Session and discover how to Create the Impossible™ with your team.

 

Stay curious, stay creative, and remember: You are not a prompt. You are the creator.

 

I’d love to hear from you: What’s one creative challenge you’ve been avoiding because you thought AI could do it better? Click here to let me know!

Senior Leaders: Ready to help your team embrace their creative power in the AI era? Book a complimentary Innovation Strategy Session and let’s explore how to foster an environment where human creativity and AI capabilities work together seamlessly.

 

 

The Leadership Blind Spot: How Your Habits Shape Team Innovation

 

Click to watch (16:26) or scroll down to read more

Hey there, innovation champions!

 

I used to think being a good leader meant having all the answers. Knowing exactly what to do in every situation. Being the smartest person in the room.

 

Boy, was I wrong.

 

Back in November, when I was faced with a choice — do I start up a grassroots democracy group, or not? — I certainly did not have all the answers. The path ahead was foggy at best, completely dark at worst.

 

It would have been so easy to just say no. To wait until I had more clarity, more resources, more certainty.

 

Instead, I leapt into the void, and you know what? I still don’t have all the answers. But the remarkable team that has sprung up around me inevitably figures it out together.

 

And this experience has taught me something profound about leadership and innovation that I never fully understood before: Your habits as a leader — how you show up, how you respond to uncertainty, how you interact with your team — shape the innovation potential of your entire organization far more than any formal innovation strategy ever could.

 

Let me show you what I mean by introducing you to our accidental “innovation team”:

 

W is our operations expert, always über-organized and keeping us on track with systems and processes. They’re also our number one worrier, always pointing out how things could go wrong. (And thank goodness, because this necessary perspective helps us plan accordingly!)

 

X is the advocate for our organization’s health, always reminding us that “overhead expenses” (like comfortable meeting space for our monthly member meetings) are not a “necessary evil,” but essential for a happy, healthy organization.

 

Y is always thinking about how what we do is a model for others. They keep us focused on the bigger picture and how our actions impact the broader community.

 

And me? I’m a big-picture thinker who also tracks a ton of details. And you won’t be surprised to learn that I filter everything through a lens of connection, fun, play, and joy.

 

The Blind Spot: Your Innovation Habits

We say very often that we’re building the plane as we fly it, and because we’re growing so fast, we’re having to build out systems, processes, and policies while we use them. Y recently quipped that we’re also writing the user manual for the plane at the same time!

 

But here’s what fascinates me: Our ability to innovate on the fly isn’t random. It’s directly shaped by the habits that each of us brings to the table as leaders.

 

A meeting typically looks like this:

 

W will ask why something was done a certain way (before we had established systems, processes, and policies, and perhaps even a leadership team!)

 

I’ll share the history.

 

W will suggest that we reverse course.

 

X will suggest an alternative option.

 

Y will “yes, and” that suggestion, and offer another idea.

 

I will “yes, and” that suggestion and bring in additional context.

 

W will revise their thinking and offer more suggestions.

 

And so on, until we find ourselves innovating a solution that everyone agrees is a win-win for all!

 

This pattern repeats itself again and again. And I’ve realized it maps perfectly to my Create the Impossible™ framework:

 

Play Hard: Creating Space for Creative Collision

The first element of my Create the Impossible™ framework is “Play Hard” — embracing a spirit of exploration and playfulness in your approach to challenges.

 

In our team, this happens naturally because of the habit patterns we’ve established. When W brings up a concern and X counters with an alternative perspective, we’re not shutting each other down — we’re playing with possibilities.

 

This habit of “yes, and-ing” rather than “yes, but-ing” isn’t accidental. It’s something I consciously model as a leader, and it’s now become a team habit.

 

Think about your own leadership habits for a moment. When someone brings up a concern or a wild idea, what’s your default response? Do you immediately point out the flaws? Or do you build on their thinking, even if you ultimately go in a different direction?

 

The habit of building rather than blocking creates a play space where innovation naturally emerges.

 

Make Crap: The Power of Imperfect Solutions

The second element of my framework is “Make Crap” — giving ourselves permission to create imperfect first drafts rather than waiting for perfection.

 

Our grassroots organization embodies this perfectly. Our initial systems were, frankly, pretty crude. Our first meeting agenda? A hastily scribbled outline. Our first communication system? A basic email list.

 

But instead of waiting until we had everything figured out, we jumped in and started creating. We embraced the messiness of growth.

 

This wasn’t accidental either — it was a direct result of leadership habits. By openly acknowledging when something I’d created wasn’t working well, I modeled that it was safe for others to do the same.

 

When was the last time you, as a leader, openly acknowledged creating something that wasn’t working? That habit — of normalizing imperfection as part of the process — creates psychological safety that’s essential for innovation.

 

Learn Fast: The Habit of Adaptation

The third element of the Create the Impossible™ framework is “Learn Fast” — turning every experience, especially “failures,” into learning opportunities.

 

In our democracy group, this manifests in our habit of constant reflection and adaptation. When something doesn’t work as expected, we don’t waste energy on blame or defensiveness. Instead, we immediately shift to “What can we learn from this?”

 

Again, this isn’t by chance. It’s a leadership habit I’ve intentionally cultivated — responding to setbacks with curiosity rather than frustration.

 

Think about your own response when things don’t go as planned. Do you immediately look for who’s responsible? Or do you ask what this experience can teach you?

 

The habit of approaching challenges with curiosity rather than judgment creates an environment where innovation can flourish even from setbacks.

 

Breaking Blind Spots: Transforming Your Innovation Habits

The fascinating thing about leadership habits is that they’re often invisible to us. They’re the water we swim in, the air we breathe. We don’t notice them because they’re just “how we do things.”

 

But these habitual patterns — how we respond to ideas, how we handle imperfection, how we approach setbacks — shape our team’s innovation potential more profoundly than any formal innovation process ever could.

 

So how do you transform these often invisible habits to foster more innovation? Here are three practical strategies:

 

1. Audit Your Responses

For one week, pay close attention to how you respond to ideas from your team. Note your initial reaction, both verbal and non-verbal. 


Are you building or blocking? Look for patterns in when you tend to block rather than build.

 

2. Practice Public Imperfection

Find opportunities to share your own works-in-progress with your team. Be explicit about what’s not working well. This normalizes imperfection and creates psychological safety for others to do the same.

 

3. Reframe Setbacks in Real Time

The next time something doesn’t go as planned, practice reframing it as a learning opportunity in the moment. Ask “What can we learn from this?” before any discussion of what went wrong or who’s responsible.

 

The Invisible Revolution

What’s most powerful about transforming your innovation habits is that it creates ripple effects throughout your organization without requiring massive change initiatives.

 

When you consistently build on others’ ideas rather than blocking them, team members start doing the same with each other.

 

When you openly share imperfect work, psychological safety increases across the organization.

 

When you approach setbacks with curiosity, a culture of continuous learning emerges.

 

These habits create the conditions where breakthrough innovations can flourish — not because you’ve mandated innovation, but because you’ve created an environment where it naturally emerges.

 

Remember: Your team doesn’t innovate because of what you say. They innovate because of what you do, consistently, day after day. Your habits are the invisible revolution that transforms your organization’s creative potential.

 

So, what innovation habits are you modeling for your team today?

 

Stay curious, stay playful, and keep creating the impossible!

 

I’d love to hear what leadership habits you’ve found most effective in fostering innovation. Click here to share your story!

Senior Leaders: Ready to transform your leadership habits and unlock your team’s innovation potential? Book a complimentary Innovation Strategy Session and let’s explore how the Create the Impossible™ framework can help you develop habits that foster creativity and breakthrough thinking across your organization.

 

Don’t show this message again.

Would You Like Some Cookies?

We use cookies to customize your experience, to improve the content we deliver to you, and sometimes to show you relevant advertising on social networking sites like Facebook or Instagram. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you give your consent to our cookie use. (Click the X in the upper right corner to close this notice.)

Read our Privacy Policy